So, as a little background, for those not in the know, Australia's Federal election is due to occur some time later this year. For the past twelve years, we've had a Liberal party government under John Howard as our Prime Minister. The Opposition was the Labour party, under Kim Beasley. Last year, Kim Beasley was replaced as leader of the Labour party by Kevin Rudd.
Ever since he took control of the party, Kevin Rudd has been breathing fresh life into a party that had grown stagnant under twelve years of failure. And this being an election year, the Federal Budget proposal is one of the major landmarks in the battle for winning the election.
Earlier this week, Peter Costello, the Federal Treasurer, presented the Liberal party's Budget proposal should they win the election. You can read about that
here, and view the actual speech at the video link on the right of there. I must admit, I haven't watched it all the way through, but it's pretty standard election-year budget fare. Tax cuts, massive education budget (targeted at higher education and universities), that sort of thing.
A traditional right of the Opposition is to give a reply speech to the Budget proposal, with their own intended plans should they win the election. You can read about that
here, with the same viewing of the speech at the video link (I highly recommend that; Rudd is a good speaker). Rudd's budget proposal was multi-pronged, with a focus on primary and secondary school education, saving money for future tough times once the mining boom ends, improving Internet infrastructure, and subsidising energy-saving and water-saving measures. And his entire proposal was aimed at the long term. It was not what you would call an "election" budget. I think it says a bit that, at the end of his speech, almost all of Parliament gave a standing ovation, and there were even whooping whistles.
Cue. The. Drama.
Costello attacks Rudd Budget 'cliches'Howard roasts Rudd on 'fiscal conservative' claim(This being a complaint I agree with partially, in that finding teachers for Rudd's education initiatives will be hard for a while (A detail of the video clip that seems to have been left out of the article, alas). However, his plan is a ten year plan, giving plenty of time to find and train teachers)
Rudd's education reply 'a poor effort'(This one I love. He's complaining about the
Labour party, which was practically built by workers, listening to unions)
Rudd too weak to confront unions: Howard(This being said today, after the Liberal party realised that people like Rudd's proposal)
PM backs 'spirit' of Rudd's skills planAs
catalase said over IM earlier, the Liberals have really dropped the ball here. Instead of attacking Rudd's plan on its few weak points, they've thrown a
massive hissy fit. If there was ever a sign of a government on its way out, that is it.
(And, um, yes, that's Kevin Rudd in my icon. I'm really growing to like him it seems)